Current:Home > MyTrendPulse|Wisconsin Supreme Court agrees to hear governor’s lawsuit against GOP-controlled Legislature -Pinnacle Profit Strategies
TrendPulse|Wisconsin Supreme Court agrees to hear governor’s lawsuit against GOP-controlled Legislature
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-09 14:12:01
MADISON,TrendPulse Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ lawsuit against the Republican-controlled Legislature arguing that it is obstructing basic government functions.
The court’s liberal majority agreed to hear the case, with the three conservative justices dissenting. It set oral arguments for April 17.
The court only agreed to immediately hear one of the three issues Evers brought forward in the complaint. That issue relates to the Legislature’s Republican-controlled budget committee blocking funding for state conservation programs.
Evers had also challenged a committee made up of legislative leaders not approving pay raises for University of Wisconsin employees. But after the lawsuit was filed, the panel did approve the raises. Evers had also challenged a legislative committee blocking updates to the state’s commercial building standards and ethics standards for licensed professionals.
The court said it was keeping both of those issues on hold pending a future order.
Liberal justices Janet Protasiewicz, Rebecca Dallet, Jill Karofsky and Ann Walsh Bradley agreed to take the case. Conservative Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and justices Brian Hagedorn and Rebecca Bradley dissented.
Rebecca Bradley, in her dissent, accused the majority of “needlessly engulfing this court in the morass of politics.”
“By accepting only one of the issues raised by the Governor and holding the other two issues in abeyance, the majority refashions this court as the Governor’s avenue for imposing policy changes without the consent of the governed,” she wrote. “When the majority’s political allies say jump, the new majority responds: ‘How high?’ ”
Hagedorn, who dissented separately, said the case was consequential and questioned taking it directly rather than have facts established through proceedings in lower courts first.
“A decision in this case could occasion a historic shift — both in the operation of state government, and in how this court interprets the boundary lines between the branches of government,” Hagedorn wrote. “Thoughtful lower court decisions usually improve the clarity of our work by framing the arguments and telling the parties what worked and what didn’t.”
Evers and the Republican legislative leaders Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu did not return messages seeking comment.
Evers argued in the lawsuit that committees controlled by a few Republican lawmakers are being used by the Legislature to “reach far beyond its proper zone of constitutional lawmaking authority.”
Evers cites the Legislature’s budget-writing committee’s rejection of dozens of conservation projects selected by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources under the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program. Republicans have long been critics of the program, which protects land from development.
LeMahieu dismissed the lawsuit as frivolous at the time it was filed, saying in a statement that Evers was “working to diminish the voice of Wisconsinites by limiting the authority of the legislature and unduly strengthening his own administration.”
Evers and the GOP-controlled Legislature have been at odds from the moment Evers was elected in November 2018. He has issued more vetoes than any other Wisconsin governor, including blocking numerous bills changing how elections would be run in the key presidential battleground state.
The Legislature convened a lame duck session just weeks before Evers took office to weaken the incoming governor’s powers. They have repeatedly rejected appointees Evers has made to boards and commissions, including firing a majority of the Natural Resources Board in October.
In another sign of their strained relationship, Evers has rarely met with Republican legislative leaders. Evers is in the second year of his second term.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court flipped to majority liberal control in August. In December, it struck down Republican-drawn legislative maps on a 4-3 decision. The Evers lawsuit is one of several high-profile cases filed by Democrats since the court’s majority changed.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Over-the-counter hearing aids will bring relief, but with some confusion
- EPA Science Advisers Push Back on Wheeler, Say He’s Minimizing Their Role
- Go Behind-the-Scenes of Brittany Mahomes’ Met Gala Prep With Her Makeup Artist
- Average rate on 30
- Vanderpump Rules: Ariana Madix Catches Tom Sandoval Lying Amid Raquel Leviss Affair
- How Georgia reduced heat-related high school football deaths
- Today’s Climate: May 19, 2010
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- 44 Mother's Day Gifts from Celebrity Brands: SKIMS, Rare Beauty, Fenty Beauty, Beis, Honest, and More
Ranking
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- California Makes Green Housing Affordable
- Vanderpump Rules: Ariana Madix Catches Tom Sandoval Lying Amid Raquel Leviss Affair
- Once-Rare Flooding Could Hit NYC Every 5 Years with Climate Change, Study Warns
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Shop the Top Aluminum-Free Deodorants That Actually Work
- Democrat Charlie Crist to face Ron DeSantis in Florida race for governor
- The Masked Singer's UFO Revealed as This Beauty Queen
Recommendation
The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
Stressed out about climate change? 4 ways to tackle both the feelings and the issues
See the Best Dressed Stars Ever at the Kentucky Derby
Score $131 Worth of Philosophy Perfume and Skincare Products for Just $62
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Odd crime scene leads to conflicting theories about the shooting deaths of Pam and Helen Hargan
Senate’s Green New Deal Vote: 4 Things You Need to Know
Today’s Climate: May 22-23, 2010